Secure the software your business runs on.

The security of the software you build or run: web and mobile apps, APIs and GraphQL, source code, open-source components, CI/CD pipelines and cloud-native services, plus threat modelling and a review of how securely your teams build software.

VAPT tests systems from the outside, across networks, cloud and applications. This service goes deeper into how software is engineered: code, components, pipelines, design and developer practice. The two work well together.

Building security into everyday software delivery: security requirements and threat models at design, automated checks in the pipeline, reviewed code, controlled releases and tracked fixes, instead of a single test just before go-live.

A yearly test sees one moment. If you release every week, most of your code has never been tested. Release-linked testing, pipeline gates and code review close that gap and stop the same issues coming back.

SAST reads source code for insecure patterns. DAST tests the running application from outside. SCA checks the open-source components you use for known flaws and risky packages. Each finds different issues.

A software bill of materials lists the components inside your software and their versions. Regulators and buyers ask for SBOMs so they can check exposure quickly when a component flaw is announced. CERT-In has published guidelines on them.

No test can guarantee that. Testing and better engineering practice reduce risk by finding and preventing the flaws attackers would most likely use, and give you evidence of where you stand.

Usually the CTO or engineering head together with the CISO, with product owners and DevOps involved. Leadership should see the summary and track how fast critical and high findings are fixed.

Web and mobile applications, REST, SOAP and GraphQL APIs, microservices, source code, open-source dependencies, CI/CD pipelines and repositories, cloud-native services, AI features, threat models and a DevSecOps maturity review.

Start with what handles money, identity or personal data, what is exposed to customers or partners, and what has changed most. The scoping call ranks these and matches them to services.

Application and API testing usually runs in a staging environment that truly mirrors production. Production is used only for agreed, non-intrusive checks, inside approved windows.

Yes, for depth. Test accounts for each role and API documentation or collections let testers reach the flows where serious flaws hide. External-only testing is possible but shows less.

Only for code review, white-box testing or SAST review. Access can be through your repository, a copy or a guided screen-share, whichever your policy allows.

Yes. Mobile backends are often the least tested APIs, because teams assume only the app will call them. Attackers do not.

It depends on the number of applications, APIs, repositories and pipelines, access readiness and review cycles. An API Quick Check is much shorter than a maturity programme. The schedule is agreed in the proposal.

API Quick Check for a focused API review, AppSec Professional for web, mobile and API testing with retest, DevSecOps Maturity to fix how software is built, and the Secure SDLC Retainer for ongoing support. Pricing is based on scope.

Code access is limited to named reviewers and to what the engagement needs. Codec Networks is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and evidence is summarised rather than copied wherever possible.

No. Tools give coverage, but reviewers read the critical paths, such as login, authorisation, payments and KYC, and validate tool results so your developers fix real issues first.

Repository access and branch protection, pipeline permissions and runners, third-party steps, secrets in variables and logs, artifact integrity, deployment approvals and the audit trail.

Yes. When incidents like the 2025 npm worm or the tampered GitHub Action are announced, composition analysis and pipeline review show quickly whether you were affected and what to rotate.

Codec Networks helps you generate and check SBOMs for your releases, in line with CERT-In's BOM guidelines, and builds SBOM generation into your pipeline where you want it.

They are reported through a secure channel straight away, so you can rotate them. Reports reference where a secret was found, not the secret itself.

It is reviewed to the same standard, with extra attention to secrets, dependencies and authorisation, where AI-assisted code often goes wrong. GitGuardian's 2026 data shows AI services driving a sharp rise in leaked secrets.

Yes, as part of application testing: prompt injection, data leakage, unsafe tool use and authorisation around AI features, using the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications as a reference.

Depending on the services: an application risk report, an API vulnerability report, a code review report, a DevSecOps maturity report, a CI/CD hardening checklist, secure coding guidance, a remediation dashboard and a retest report.

On a five-level scale from Critical to Informational. Each rating starts from the CVSS base score and is adjusted for exploitability, asset criticality and business impact.

Yes. Each finding includes affected endpoints or code locations, reproduction steps, evidence and fix guidance for your languages and frameworks.

Yes. Walk-throughs explain each finding and fix, and secure coding sessions address recurring patterns. Implementing the fixes stays with your teams, which keeps the retest independent.

A focused check that each fixed finding is really closed. The retest report marks every item as fixed, partly fixed or still open, and it is what customers and auditors usually ask for.

The business owner can formally accept or defer the risk. A risk-acceptance note records the justification, the residual risk and the owner's approval.

Reports are confidential. Many clients share a summary or a letter confirming testing and closure with enterprise customers, and keep technical detail internal.

Track repeat findings, remediation times and maturity level on the dashboard. Fewer repeats and faster closure are the clearest signs that security is built in.

Yes. Codec Networks is empanelled by CERT-In for information security auditing services, and with NICSI for application audit and compliance services in the start-up category.

It provides technical evidence for application, API, mobile and software supply-chain expectations in instruments such as RBI's 2026 Directions and SEBI's CSCRF. Compliance depends on your full set of obligations; confirm against the official texts.

PCI DSS v4.0.1 Requirement 6 covers secure development of custom software and protection of public-facing web applications, including payment-page script controls. Codec Networks' testing and code review map to those requirements.

Yes. Results support ISO/IEC 27001:2022 secure development controls (Annex A 8.25 to 8.29) and SOC 2 criteria on change management, vulnerability management and logical access.

The DPDP Act 2023 requires reasonable security safeguards for personal data. Applications and APIs that handle personal data are where those safeguards are tested most directly.

It may. The EU Cyber Resilience Act brings secure-by-design and vulnerability handling duties for products with digital elements, with reporting from September 2026 and full application from December 2027.

Most of it, yes. Application, API, code and pipeline work is remote-first through secure access; threat modelling and maturity workshops can be run on site if you prefer.

Book a scoping call. We agree the applications, APIs, repositories and pipelines to cover, propose an engagement model, sign the rules of engagement and start on the agreed date.